Physics, Space, Astronomy Variety – 4.30pm Sunday 20th April 2025

Physics, Space, Astronomy Variety – 4.30pm Sunday 20th April 2025

Do we tend to think of our space within the gravity and atmosphere of Earth as not part of space? Or do we think of it as part of space, just that it is space filled with gases held to Earth, but still part of space none the less?
Due to the atmosphere and gravity, resistance affects movement that doesn’t occur outside of Earths field of gravity and gases.
Which in a sense makes space itself very malleable ie., Earth is able to hold a large amount of space around it, utilize and affect it into behaving as it does.

So when a black hole is interacting with space, it’s still the same malleable space. If dark matter was the source of gravity, wouldn’t it be pouring in to the black hole? Wouldn’t that affect the gravity of the stars surrounding it? Wouldn’t there be shortfalls fluctuating the surrounding gravity field/s?

If you are familiar with my work, then you might recall that I theorised that the ability for entanglement may have been the catalyst for achieving the constant state of gravity. I also discussed my theory that at the molecular level, knowledge is shared so that all is known. Being so small permits that size to get around the physics that we cannot. We cannot pass through another being for instance. So being that small permits physics that may seem peculiar, but it’s really just size and speed. So entanglement permits to be themself and also each other, whilst the state prevails. So the interior of a star would or should provide a constant long lived environmental state that would suit entanglement. I thought of a tuning fork struck and sustained, provided that sound or hum remains constant and unchanged, so does the entanglement. Interrupted, it reverts back to the singular and any knowledge gained would remain. And what better way to communicate for the tiny, than to be able to become each other, while still being their self?
If we could do that, we would choose to do so I would think. (As wanted or needed, as the case may be. Deceit would be impossible wouldn’t it?)

If my work is correct and the Universe is the result of the black hole phenomenon, then the singularity is not part of this type. And the space within the black hole can have a smaller version exist within it because the space is still the same and malleable. And I think I mentioned that a merging pair, if singularities were present, how would the physics of a pair of singularities meeting behave? That needs to be considered I feel.

Fiona MacLeod (C)