My Genetics and Astronomy/Physics Work – 6.13pm Friday 14th March 2025

My Genetics and Astronomy/Physics Work – 6.13pm Friday 14th March 2025

There are now numerous incidents of my work being published by others as their own.

 

Mars – there are now several articles (and possibly others) that I’m recently aware of, containing my work, concepts and theories about the planet. They all fail to mention me and are taking credit for my work.

 

There is an aeronautics organisation which has recently published astronomy articles containing my work which is my intellectual property that is unique to me. This American organisation has also failed to acknowledge me. There could be other incidences by this same organisation I’m as yet unaware of, considering the recent blatant copyright infringement.

 

Decades I was working on the genetics of pigmentation re hair, eyes and skin. Nobody was working on it and in fact I was told it had already been considered irrelevant and likely a waste of my time. I knew otherwise.

I haven’t been acknowledged for my work yet, however I have seen studies on a variety of my molecular genetics theories and yet again, not a single mention of me.

 

Of particular interest is auburn hair, eye colour and the pale skin that so often accompanies auburn hair.

Currently, I believe science is of the opinion that our auburn hair mutation commenced with our associating with Neanderthals? It is possible that this occurred, however, my work indicates that the Neanderthal didn’t start out with auburn hair and came by the mutation via a failing of the black hair gene, which would also be a very old and well used pigment gene.

That being correct, it’s entirely feasible that we can experience the very same issue that the Neanderthal did and incur the auburn hair mutation via the same failing.

Which means we could have multiple versions. Ie., the version passed on by Neanderthal, which would be much older, our own newer, new mutation version and the versions we inherit in the usual way. If we are certain that one of the versions came via the Neanderthal, then it’s possible the versions could meet when a couple carrying the auburn mutation have a version from this pair of scenarios.

So we need to be certain if the mutation we have is ours or passed along via the Neanderthal.

 

That said, a week or so ago an article showing an Orca born lacking it’s black skin colouring, showing a light orange shade of skin in its place, caught my attention because this is exactly what I expected to see when the black pigment gene fails. And quite possibly for same or similar reasons.

So I made an audio of copyright notes where I discussed this Orca and also mentioned that I believed the orangutan was almost certainly originally black furred. And that gorillas too were now displaying some auburn and my theory here for them is essentially the same, the black pigment gene is old or has sustained losses, provoking the auburn mutation. The chestnut coloured horse, possibly there is a relationship for them also, it’s difficult to know, however I’m aware that they are often prone to being very temperamental, which is notable. Ie., a behavioral condition linked to their colouring.

 

That said, I noticed an article today which is researching pigmentation of hair fur etc., in fossils. I did not see any mention of my work in their article. But I have noticed that there has been a very significant interest in this area since I did my work, where before there was virtually none. Yet not a single acknowledgement of my work, or mention of my work having prompted their own studies.

But it’s quite apparent that it was my work that provoked this new interest and research in this area of genetics.

And the same can be said in the astronomy field also. A mass flurry of activity in these fields, yet not a single acknowledgement or citing of my work. And now I’m seeing my actual theories and others taking credit for them.

I will be seeking legal assistance. Especially in the case where a nobel prize was awarded and accepted, by people taking credit for my work. So blatant, they used the word ‘gravitational’ that I had used with my theoretical work but had never seen it used prior. And since my initial use of it, the astronomy field has used it adnauseum.

Fiona MacLeod (C)