Gravity, Black Holes & Theories – 6.20pm Tuesday 5th November 2024
Gravity, Black Holes & Theories – 6.20pm Tuesday 5th November 2024
As some are aware, I have theorised the universe to be the same phenomena as the ‘black holes’ that exist within the universe. Assuming for a moment that I am correct, then the ‘Big Bang’ event was the explosion that created it.
If we are to believe that before the universe there was nothing, then what exploded? Where did the forces stem from that were theorised to separate as a result of this explosion?
If we are in an extraordinarily large version of the black hole phenomena, then we should see the effects of the perpetual force created by that explosion and be in its perpetual slip stream. (Which we appear to be). There should be rotation which we know black holes rotate and rotation speed is known to be effected when meeting the rotation speed of another black hole.
We should also see perpetual radiation within the ‘black hole’ universe.
The black hole universe itself would have no use for gravity, the stars and planets within it are the entities that need gravity. We ourselves need gravity.
If general relativity is the correct formula of gravity, how is the expanding universe creating it? This too is in opposition to the force expanding it.
If gravity is relative to mass and pushing on Earth for example, then the Earth’s rotation must impact this phenomena. Therefore, shouldn’t any change in our planets rotation effect the Earth’s gravity if it is a force pushing on it from beyond?
Another part of my theory was the existence of extremely large stars, or different type of, that could explain the presence of very large early black holes, which we know now to also have occurred. The largest star known in our universe is approximately 1700x the size of our Sun. This supports the distinct possibly of larger star types of differing physics from space beyond the theorised event horizon of our universe.
As time has gone by, many observations and research now exists that support a great deal of my work but yet my work remains without acknowledgement.
My ‘spin’ theory, for example, is now proven, yet my name has not been attributed or acknowledged. Spin is just referred to as ‘Spin’ yet this was an integral piece of my work. Why is this?
Dark matter, as I understand it was a theory created, in order to support the theory of general relativity, but if gravity is a force being created by the objects that require it, along with those also creating their own magnetic fields, then that may be
somewhat of a mistake to bank all on a single theory, unable to be validated or to move on, like the phono caught in the groove of the vinyl record. Stuck.
If the universe was creating gravity, it would have to be an unreliable force, fraught with fluctuations causing mayhem, in my view.
Fiona MacLeod (C)
